4.0 Review

The Neutralizing Antibody Response to he HIV-1 Env Protein

Journal

CURRENT HIV RESEARCH
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 21-28

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1570162X15666171124122044

Keywords

HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein; broadly neutralizing antibodies; virus-host co-evolution; viral escape; immunogens; passive immunity

Funding

  1. South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology
  2. National Research Foundation of South Africa
  3. National Institutes for Health [AI116086-01]
  4. SA Medical Research Council SHIP program
  5. Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research (CAPRISA)
  6. Department of Science and Technology
  7. National Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: A vaccine able to elicit broadly neutralizing antibodies capable of blocking infection by global viruses has not been achieved, and remains a key public health challenge. Objective: During infection, a robust strain-specific neutralizing response develops in most people, but only a subset of infected people develop broadly neutralizing antibodies. Understanding how and why these broadly neutralizing antibodies develop has been a focus of the HIV-1 vaccine field for many years, and has generated extraordinary insights into the neutralizing response to HIV-1 infection. Results: This review describes the features, targets and developmental pathways of early strain specific antibodies and later broadly neutralizing antibodies, and explores the reasons such broad antibodies are not more commonly elicited during infection. Conclusion: The insights from these studies have been harnessed for the development of pioneering new vaccine approaches that seek to drive B cell maturation towards breadth. Overall, this review describes how findings from infected donors have impacted on active and passive immunization approaches that seek to prevent HIV-1 infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available