4.3 Review

Sleep in Type 1 Diabetes: Implications for Glycemic Control and Diabetes Management

Journal

CURRENT DIABETES REPORTS
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

CURRENT MEDICINE GROUP
DOI: 10.1007/s11892-018-0974-8

Keywords

Type 1 diabetesmellitus; Sleep; Self-management; Adherence; Glycemic control; Diabetes technology

Funding

  1. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [T32HD060554] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [P30DK092986, R21DK110657] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NICHD NIH HHS [T32 HD060554] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDDK NIH HHS [P30 DK092986, R21 DK110657] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of Review To highlight recent findings from studies of sleep in type 1 diabetes (T1D), with a focus on the role of sleep in self-management, the cognitive and psychosocial outcomes related to sleep disturbances, and factors associated with sleep disturbances specific to T1D. Recent Findings People with T1D experience higher rates of sleep disturbances than people without diabetes, and these disturbances have negative implications for glycemic control and diabetes management, as well as psychosocial and cognitive outcomes. Inconsistent sleep timing (bedtime and wake time) has emerged as a potential target for interventions, as variability in sleep timing has been linked with poorer glycemic control and adherence to treatment. Sleep-promoting interventions and new diabetes technology have the potential to improve sleep in people with T1D. Summary Sleep is increasingly considered a critical factor in diabetes management, but more multi-method and longitudinal research is needed. We emphasize the importance of sufficient and consistent sleep for people with T1D, and the need for providers to routinely assess sleep among patients with T1D.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available