Journal
JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH
Volume 54, Issue -, Pages 95-104Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.06.011
Keywords
Forward collision warning; Naturalistic driving study; Driver behavior; Time to collision
Categories
Funding
- Toyota Collaborative Safety Research Center
- Toyota Motor Corporation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Problem: Forward collision warning (FCW) systems are designed to mitigate the effects of rear-end collisions. Driver acceptance of these systems is crucial to their success, as perceived nuisance alarms may cause drivers to disable the systems. In order to make customizable FCW thresholds, system designers need to quantify the variation in braking behavior in the driving population. The objective of this study was to quantify the time to collision (TTC) that drivers applied the brakes during car following scenarios from a large scale naturalistic driving study (NDS). Methods: Because of the large amount of data generated by NDS, an automated algorithm was developed to identify lead vehicles using radar data recorded as part of the study. Using the search algorithm, all trips from 64 drivers from the 100-Car NDS were analyzed. A comparison of the algorithm to 7135 brake applications where the presence of a lead vehicle was manually identified found that the algorithm agreed with the human review 90.6% of the time. Results: This study examined 72,123 trips that resulted in 2.6 million brake applications. Population distributions of the minimum, 1st and 10th percentiles were computed for each driver in speed ranges between 3 and 60 mph in 10 mph increments. As speed increased, so did the minimum TTC experience by drivers as well as variance in TIC. Younger drivers (18-30) had lower ITC at brake application compared to older drivers (30-51 +), especially at speeds between 40 mph and 60 mph. Discussion: This is one of the first studies to use large scale NDS data to quantify braking behavior during car following. The results of this study can be used to design and evaluate FCW systems and calibrate traffic simulation models. (C) 2015 National Safety Council and Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available