4.5 Article

Aptian and Albian ammonites of the Miyako Group, Japan (Lower Cretaceous ammonites of the Miyako Group, Part 11)

Journal

CRETACEOUS RESEARCH
Volume 88, Issue -, Pages 227-272

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cretres.2017.09.010

Keywords

Systematic description; Ammonite biostratigraphic zones; Morphological analysis; Transgression population appearance ratio

Funding

  1. Japan Society of Promotion of Science [15K05328-0]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K05328] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thirty-four upper Aptian to lower Albian ammonite species from the Miyako Group, northeast Japan are described herein: seven phylloceratids, three lytoceratids, one gaudryceratid, one tetragonitid, one oppelid, eight desmoceratids, one cleoniceratid, one hoplitid, three ptychoceratids, four anisoceratids, two douvilleiceratids, and two parahoplitids. Among the described species, Valdedorsella kasei, Dipty-choceras iwatense, Protanisoceras (P.) hanaii, and Hypacnthoplites regina are proposed as new species. To date, fifty-five species belonging to 35 genera have been described from the ammonite fauna of the Miyako Group. This ammonite fauna can be subdivided into three ammonite biostratigraphic zones (Hypacanthoplites subcornuerianus Zone, Diadochoceras nodosocostatiforme Zone and Douvilleiceras mammilatum Zone in ascending order), and these zones are defined. These zones can be correlated with the upper Aptian to lower Albian of the European standard zonation. Ammonites of the Miyako Group diversified morphologically with transgression, and expanded the range of their habitation area. This expansion developed by chance at approximately the even level for each taxon. Ammonite biogeography is interpreted to be controlled by oceanic currents of the circum Pacific rim. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available