4.6 Article

Looking but not seeing: Increased eye fixations in behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia

Journal

CORTEX
Volume 103, Issue -, Pages 71-81

Publisher

ELSEVIER MASSON, CORPORATION OFFICE
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.02.011

Keywords

Younger onset dementia; Face processing; Emotion processing; Frontal pole

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [APP1037746]
  2. Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders [CE110001021]
  3. University of Sydney, School of Psychology scholarship
  4. NHMRC-ARC Dementia Research Development Fellowship [APP1097026]
  5. NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship [APP1103258]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Face processing plays a central role in human communication, with the eye region a particularly important cue for discriminating emotions. Indeed, reduced attention to the eyes has been argued to underlie social deficits in a number of clinical populations. Despite well-established impairments in facial affect recognition in behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia, whether these patients also have perturbed facial scanning is yet to be investigated. The current study employed eye tracking to record visual scanning of faces in 20 behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia patients and 21 controls. Remarkably, behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia patients displayed more fixations to the eyes of emotional faces, compared to controls. Neural regions associated with fixations to the eyes included the left inferior frontal gyrus, right cerebellum and middle temporal gyrus. Our study is the first to show such compensatory functions in behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia and suggest a feedback-style network, including anterior and posterior brain regions, is involved in early face processing. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available