4.5 Article

Feeding on microbiomes: effects of detritivory on the taxonomic and phylogenetic bacterial composition of animal manures

Journal

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY
Volume 91, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiv117

Keywords

bacterial communities; bacterial diversity; Bar-coded pyrosequencing; Eisenia andrei; earthworm; core microbiome

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [CTM2013-42540-R]
  2. Xunta de Galicia [CN2012/305]
  3. FCT Investigator Program
  4. Brigham Young University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Earthworms play a key role in nutrient cycling by interacting with microorganisms thus accelerating organic matter turnover in soil systems. As detritivores, some earthworm types ingest and digest a mixture of dead organic matter and microorganisms, like animal manures (i.e. animal gut microbiomes). Here we described the earthworm cast microbiome and the role ingested bacteria play on its composition. We fed Eisenia andrei with cow, horse and pig manures and determined the taxonomic and phylogenetic composition of the these manures before and after passage through the earthworm gut. Earthworm cast microbiomes showed a smaller diversity than the manure they fed on. Manures strongly differed in their taxonomic and phylogenetic composition, but these differences were markedly reduced once transformed into earthworm cast microbiomes after passage through the earthworm gut. The core earthworm cast microbiome comprised 30 OTUs (2.6% of OTUs from cast samples), of which 10 are possibly native to the earthworm gut. Most of the core cast microbiome OTUs belonged to phyla Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria, as opposed to already described animal core gut microbiomes, which are composed mainly of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. Our results suggest that earthworms build up their cast microbiome by selecting from the pool of ingested bacteria.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available