4.7 Article

Cultural heritage management and monitoring using remote sensing data and GIS: The case study of Paphos area, Cyprus

Journal

COMPUTERS ENVIRONMENT AND URBAN SYSTEMS
Volume 54, Issue -, Pages 230-239

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.09.003

Keywords

Cultural heritage; Remote sensing techniques; Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP); Risk assessment; GIS analysis

Funding

  1. European Regional Development Funds [AEIPhiOPIA/KOIAPhi/0311(BIE)/06]
  2. Remote Sensing and Geo-Environment Laboratory of the Department of Civil Engineering & Geomatics at the Cyprus University of Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cultural heritage (CH) sites are threatened from a variety of natural and anthropogenic factors. Innovative and cost effective tools for systematic monitoring of landscapes and CH sites are needed to protect them. Towards this direction, the article presents a multidisciplinary approach, based on remote sensing techniques and Geographical Information System (GIS) analysis, in order to assess the overall risk in the Paphos district (Cyprus). Paphos region has a great deal of archaeological sites and isolated monuments, which reflect the long history of the area, while some of them are also listed in the UNESCO catalogue of World Cultural Heritage sites. Several natural and anthropogenic hazards have been mapped using different remote sensing data and methodologies. All data were gathered from satellite images and satellite products. The results from each hazard were imported into a GIS environment in order to examine the overall risk assessment based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methodology. The results found that the methodology applied was effective enough in the understanding of the current conservation circumstances of the monuments in relation to their environment as well as predicting the future development of the present hazards. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available