4.4 Article

The Structure of Psychopathology in Adolescence: Replication of a General Psychopathology Factor in the TRAILS Study

Journal

CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages 850-860

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/2167702614560750

Keywords

psychopathology; replication; confirmatory factor analysis; adolescence

Funding

  1. etherlands Organization for Scientific Research NWO (Medical Research Council Program ) [GB-MW 94038 011]
  2. ZonMW Brainpower [100-001-004]
  3. ZonMw Risk Behavior and Dependence [60-60600-98-018, 60-60600-97-118]
  4. ZonMw Culture and Health [261-98-710]
  5. Social Sciences Council Medium-Sized Investment [GB-MaGW 480-01-006, GBMaGW 480-07-001]
  6. Social Sciences Council [GB-MaGW 457-03-018, GB-MaGW 452-04-314, GB-MaGW 452-06-004]
  7. NWO Large-Sized Investment Grant [175.010.2003.005]
  8. Sophia Foundation for Medical Research [301, 393]
  9. Dutch Ministry of Justice (WODC)
  10. European Science Foundation EuroSTRESS [FP-006]
  11. participating universities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to replicate a study by Caspi and colleagues, which proposed that the structure of psychopathology is characterized by a general psychopathology factor, in addition to smaller internalizing and externalizing factors. Our study expanded the approach of the original by using continuous adolescent data and testing additional models, including both self-and parent-reported data, to bolster the robustness of the findings. Our findings indicate that the structure of psychopathology is best characterized by a model including a general factor, in addition to smaller internalizing and externalizing factors. These results emphasize the importance of this model for understanding the structure of psychopathology. Given the increasing emphasis on the importance of, and need for, replication, the overall evidence of a general factor seems rather robust.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available