4.7 Article

Enhancement of mechanical and electrical properties of graphene/cement composite due to improved dispersion of graphene by addition of silica fume

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 164, Issue -, Pages 433-441

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.176

Keywords

Graphene; Silica fume; Cement composite; Dispersion; Mechanical properties; Electrical properties

Funding

  1. National Key Technology Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2015BAB07B04]
  2. National Key Research and Development Plan of China [2016YFC0401610]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2015B25814, 2015B26714]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of China [51278167]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Incorporation of graphene into cement-based materials has attracted extensive attention of many researchers. Achieving effective dispersion of graphene can contribute to improving the mechanical and other properties of the cement composite. In this study, the effects of silica fume content on compressive strength and electrical resistivity of the graphene/cement composite were investigated. The distribution of graphene and silica fume in cement matrix was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and the pore structure of the composite was analyzed by mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). Results revealed that silica fume was capable of facilitating the dispersion of graphene and increasing the interfacial strength between graphene and cement matrix. Moderate amount of silica fume can refine the pore structure of the cement paste. Incorporation of appropriate amount of silica fume can increase the compressive strength and reduce the electrical resistivity of the composite. However, the extra amount of silica fume had a negative effect on mechanical and electrical performances. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available