4.7 Article

Discussion and experiments on the limits of chloride, sulphate and shell content in marine fine aggregates for concrete

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 159, Issue -, Pages 725-733

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.078

Keywords

Dredged marine sand (DMS); Chloride; Sulphate; Shell; Limits from the standards; Experimental study

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51478271]
  2. Shenzhen Technology Innovation Research project [JSGG20160429111117023]
  3. DEGP Key Project [2014KZDXM051]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Concrete is the most consumable building material in the world. Marine aggregates are the natural sand and gravels available in the sea or dredged from seabed. Contents of chloride, sulphate and shell in the marine aggregates can influence the properties of concrete and correspondidg performance of the concrete structures. However, the limitations of chloride, sulphate and shell contents are set as different threshold values in different countries and/or regions. Some of them are inconsistent or puzzling for user. This paper presents a comprehensive review on the limit values of these contents used in different countries and provides a better understadding on the rationale behind these limit values thorough analysis on the limits of chloride, sulphate and shell content in marine fine aggregates for concrete. Except discussion, in this paper, an experimental study was carried out to evaluate the corrosion of reinforcing steel in concrete mixed with DMS as well. The experimental results of corrosion potential and corrosion current density showed that the rebar in DMS concrete should be safe from corrosion when the chloride content in DMS is less than 0.18% or the total chloride content in concrete is less than 034%. This study can contribute to fill the knowledge gap on concrete applications on dredged marine sand (DMS) and relative research. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available