4.8 Article

Tuning and understanding the supercapacitance of heteroatom-doped graphene

Journal

ENERGY STORAGE MATERIALS
Volume 1, Issue -, Pages 103-111

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2015.09.002

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51372178]
  2. PCSIRT [IRT14R18]
  3. Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Hubei Province of China [2013CFA021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon nanomaterials are promising for making high-performance supercapacitors. However, their specific capacitances and energy densities still need further improvement for many important and challenging applications. Here we report the superior capacitive performance of heteroatom-doped graphene synthesized by a thermal annealing method at low temperature (200 degrees C), and remarkably enhanced specific capacitance of 629 F g(-1) at 0.2 A g(-1), energy density of 43 Wh kg(-1) at 140W kg(-1), and cycle life of 10,000 times are achieved. The mechanisms for the outstanding performance are analyzed, and a corresponding model connecting the dopant and capacitance is proposed and validated by the first-principle calculations. The thermal annealing temperature plays a critical role in the dopant configuration of heteroatom and hence significantly affects the capacitive properties of graphene If annealing at low temperature, non-graphitic dopant configuration is dominant, inducing a large Faradaic pseudocapacitance; if annealing at high temperature, graphitic clopant configuration is dominant, giving rise to a relatively lower electrical double layer capacitance. These findings demonstrate that the supercapacitance of graphene can be purposely tuned by the rational doping of heteroatoms, which may open up new strategies for further design and application of advanced graphene-based materials for electrochemical supercapacitors. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available