4.2 Article

Understanding intentions from actions: Direct perception, inference, and the roles of mirror and mentalizing systems

Journal

CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION
Volume 36, Issue -, Pages 426-433

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.03.012

Keywords

Mental states; Intentionality; Intention understanding; Action observation; Action understanding; Mirror neurons; Kinematics; Mentalizing; Direct perception; Inference

Funding

  1. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/K00140X/1]
  2. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/K00140X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. ESRC [ES/K00140X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review asks whether observers can obtain information about others' intentions from observation of their actions; and if so, whether this process is performed using direct perceptual or inferential processes (prominent examples of each being the intention understanding theory of mirror neuron function, and mentalizing accounts of intention understanding, respectively). I propose four conditions that should be fulfilled in order to support a direct perception account, and suggest that only two of these conditions are supported by the existing data. I then propose and review three further sources of evidence which have the potential to inform this debate, concluding that the data do not support the direct perception account. In particular, mirror neurons may be involved in lower-level processes of action perception, but there is no evidence to support their involvement in the type of higher-level intention understanding that is proposed by the direct perception account. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available