4.7 Article

The urban heat island effect and city contiguity

Journal

COMPUTERS ENVIRONMENT AND URBAN SYSTEMS
Volume 54, Issue -, Pages 181-194

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.08.002

Keywords

Urban heat island; Urban morphology; Spatial contiguity; Urban planning; PRISM; Spatial metrics

Funding

  1. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
  2. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1229429] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The spatial configuration of cities can affect how urban environments alter local energy balances. Previous studies have reached the paradoxical conclusions that both sprawling and high-density urban development can amplify urban heat island intensities, which has prevented consensus on how best to mitigate the urban heat island effect via urban planning. To investigate this apparent dichotomy, we estimated the urban heat island intensities of the 50 most populous cities in the United States using gridded minimum temperature datasets and quantified each city's urban morphology with spatial metrics. The results indicated that the spatial contiguity of urban development, regardless of its density or degree of sprawl, was a critical factor that influenced the magnitude of the urban heat island effect. A ten percentage point increase in urban spatial contiguity was predicted to enhance the minimum temperature annual average urban heat island intensity by between 03 and 0.4 degrees C. Therefore, city contiguity should be considered when devising strategies for urban heat island mitigation, with more discontiguous development likely to ameliorate the urban heat island effect. Unraveling how urban morphology influences urban heat island intensity is paramount given the human health consequences associated with the continued growth of urban populations in the future. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available