4.7 Article

Effect of fineness and replacement ratio of ground fly ash on properties of blended cement mortar

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 176, Issue -, Pages 250-258

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.060

Keywords

Fly ash; Fineness; Replacement ratio; Mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP); Scanning electron microscopy (SEM); X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents an experimental investigation on the effect of ground fly ash fineness and replacement ratio on properties of blended cement mortar. Class F fly ash was ground into three different fineness values of 4610 cm(2)/g, 5690 cm(2)/g, and 6300 cm(2)/g with ball grinding machine and used as a replacement ratios of 0%, 10%, 15%, and 20% by weight of cement to produce the blended cement mortars. Compressive strength test, water absorption, mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) test, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis were performed. Test results show that the use of fly ash resulted in significant improvement in compressive strength and substantial decrease in water absorption and capillary pores for blended cement mortars compared to OPC mortar. The mortars with fineness value of 5690 cm(2)/g and FA replacement ratio of 20% has the highest compressive strength and lowest water absorption and smallest porosity. The XRD analysis showed that Ca(OH)(2) is one of the hydration products during the hydration reaction. When fly ashes were incorporated into the blended cement mortars, the intensity peaks of Ca(OH)(2) in the XRD patterns decreased. The increasing replacement ratio of fly ash decreased Ca(OH)(2). Based on the results, both the fly ash fineness and the fly ash replacement ratio have a significant influence on the properties of blended cement mortar. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available