4.3 Article

Shorebird hunting in Barbados: Using stable isotopes to link the harvest at a migratory stopover site with sources of production

Journal

CONDOR
Volume 120, Issue 2, Pages 357-370

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1650/CONDOR-17-127.1

Keywords

carbon-13; deuterium; harvested species; fall migration; migratory connectivity; nitrogen-15; shorebirds; stable isotopes

Categories

Funding

  1. Environment and Climate Change Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding spatial connectivity of long-distance migrants is important for effective management and conservation of both game and nongame species. Hunting of Nearctic-breeding shorebirds occurs in the Caribbean and northern South America; however, the origins of harvested individuals are generally unknown. We used stable hydrogen isotopes (delta H-2) in feathers of juvenile shorebirds to infer the origins of birds harvested at 2 sites in Barbados using probabilistic assignments based on a terrestrial-freshwater delta H-2 isoscape. We used tissue delta C-13 and delta N-15 values to filter individuals that had derived nutrients from marine sources. Natal origins of juvenile American Golden-Plover (Pluvialis dominica), Stilt Sandpiper (Calidris himantopus), Short-billed Dowitcher (Limnodromus griseus), and Lesser Yellowlegs (Tringa flavipes) were predicted to be mainly from the eastern parts of their breeding ranges in eastern Canada, with American Golden-Plover, Stilt Sandpiper, and Short-billed Dowitcher also having high potential areas of origin in parts of Alaska, USA. Results from our study should help to modify prior estimates of sustainable harvest levels for these species. We identify sources of uncertainty in determining shorebird origins using stable isotopes, including a lack of shorebird-specific calibration equations and the apparent lack of an appropriate tissue for breeding ground assignment for adults.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available