4.7 Article

Influence of anionic dietary fibers (xanthan gum and pectin) on oxidative stability and lipid digestibility of wheat protein-stabilized fish oil-in-water emulsion

Journal

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
Volume 74, Issue -, Pages 131-139

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.04.022

Keywords

Wheat gliadin; Xanthan gum; Emulsions; Oxidative stability; Lipid digestibility

Funding

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2013AA102201]
  2. United States Department of Agriculture (National Research Initiative) [2011-03539, 2013-03795]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of two anionic dietary fibers (xanthan gum and pectin) on the oxidative stability and lipid digestibility of fish oil emulsions stabilized by wheat protein (gliadin) was investigated. Lipid oxidation was determined by measuring lipid hydroperoxides and TBARS of the emulsions during storage, while protein oxidation was measured using fluorescence spectroscopy. Lipid and protein oxidation was faster at pH 3.5 than at pH 7, which may have been due to increased iron solubility under acidic conditions. Xanthan gum inhibited lipid and protein oxidation, which was attributed to its ability to bind iron ions. Conversely, pectin promoted oxidation, which was attributed to the presence of endogenous transition metals in the polysaccharide ingredient. In vitro digestion was carried out to evaluate the digestibility of oil droplets in emulsions with or without polysaccharides. Both xanthan gum and pectin significantly increased the rate of lipid digestion, which was attributed to their ability to inhibit droplet aggregation under gastrointestinal conditions. These results have important implications for designing emulsion-based functional foods with improved oxidative stability and lipid digestibility. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available