4.7 Article

Pixel based bruise region extraction of apple using Vis-NIR hyperspectral imaging

Journal

COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE
Volume 146, Issue -, Pages 12-21

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.01.013

Keywords

Bruise of apple; Hyperspectral imaging; Principal component analysis; Pixel based classification; Random Forest

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bruises on apples will directly influence its preservation and marketing for they can cause the internal decomposition and flaws of the appearance of apples. Therefore, an effective pixel based bruise region extraction method was proposed in this study to obtain the complete bruise region. Hyperspectral images of 60 apples were obtained via the hyperspectral imaging (HSI) system at 0, 12 and 18 h after the damage experiment. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to compression data size and eliminating redundant data of hyperspectral image cubes. After the selection of the region of interest (ROD by certain rules, different pixel based apple bruise extraction models were built and compared. The result shows that Random Forest (RF) model have a high and stable classification accuracy, which turns out that RF algorithm is more suitable for classifying bruises on apples than others. The average accuracy of bruise extraction models reached 99.9%. Compared with the most used image processing method in recent literature for extracting bruises of apples, the bruising region predicted by RF model was more consistent with the true bruise region. Additionally, two characteristic wavebands around 675 nm and 960 nm related to the bruise region were singled out for reducing the dimensionality of data by analyzing the feature importance scores of the built RF model. The overall results indicated that the proposed method has a great potential to detect complete bruise region on apples based on hyperspectral imaging for improving the efficiency of apple grading and sorting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available