4.7 Article

Optimization of vacuum cooling treatment of postharvest broccoli using response surface methodology combined with genetic algorithm technique

Journal

COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE
Volume 144, Issue -, Pages 209-215

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2017.12.010

Keywords

Postharvest broccoli; Vacuum cooling process; Optimization; Response surface methodology; Genetic algorithm

Funding

  1. UNINOVE
  2. CNPq-Brazilian National Research Council [311971/2015-6]
  3. Chinese National Key Technology RD Program [2011AA100804, 2012BAD31B06]
  4. Province Key RD project [2010R50032]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, the effects of vacuum cooling factors on the weight loss of postharvest broccoli Were initially investigated. In sequence, the vacuum cooling treatment conditions were optimized using the response surface methodology (RSM) combined with the genetic algorithm (GA) technique. Fresh broccoli samples were harvested from a Chinese farm, and the green heads of selected samples were cut into smaller pieces, with diameters approximately 3-4 cm, and sequentially equilibrated to room temperature. Pressure (200-600 Pa), broccoli weight (200-500 g), water volume (2-6%, v/v) and time (20-40 min) were used as factors, and weight loss and end temperature were recorded as responses. The GA was employed to find the optimal condition for processing broccoli, and its initial solution was obtained from the RSM. The results demonstrate a good performance of the GA for the optimization of the broccoli cooling process. The best conditions of vacuum cooling process were as follows: a weight between 273.5 g and 278.0 g, a water volume of 3.0% v/v, a processing time of 40 min, a pressure of 200 Pa, and a weight loss and end temperature of 0.34 +/- 0.01% and 2.0 +/- 0.0 degrees C, respectively, leading to a percentage of profit of 99.66 +/- 0.01%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available