4.7 Article

Stress-constrained topology optimization based on maximum stress measures

Journal

COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES
Volume 198, Issue -, Pages 23-39

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2018.01.008

Keywords

Topology optimization; Stress constraints; SIMP method; Nodal density variable; Stress aggregation function

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51478086, 11772079]
  2. National Key Research Development Program of China [2016YFB0201601]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes two effective constraint schemes to address the stress-constrained topology optimization of continuum structures. By considering the maximum stress measure in the global and local forms, respectively, the STM (stability transformation method)-based stress correction scheme and the violated set enhanced stress measure are developed to tackle the challenging issues from numerous local stress constraints and highly nonlinear stress behavior. Particularly, a stress aggregation function is involved in the design sensitivity analysis. Moreover, the nodal variable based SIMP method and adjoint sensitivity analysis are employed to solve the optimum topological design problems with two different optimization formulations. Finally, several representative examples demonstrate the validity of the present approach. It is also indicated that the numerical performance of the stress aggregation function is closely related to the problem formulation of topology optimization. The STM-based stress correction scheme is appropriate to the material volume minimization design, while the violated set enhanced stress measure is suitable for the mean compliance minimization design. Meanwhile, the proposed optimization approach can handle the stress-constrained topology optimization with easy implementation, low computational cost and stable convergence. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available