4.4 Article

Becoming a high-fidelity - super - imitator: what are the contributions of social and individual learning?

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages 1025-1035

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/desc.12276

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University Facilitating Funds (GWU)
  2. National Science Foundation [BCS-0748717]
  3. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  4. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci [1023772, 0748717] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In contrast to other primates, human children's imitation performance goes from low to high fidelity soon after infancy. Are such changes associated with the development of other forms of learning? We addressed this question by testing 215 children (26-59 months) on two social conditions (imitation, emulation) - involving a demonstration - and two asocial conditions (trial-and-error, recall) - involving individual learning - using two touchscreen tasks. The tasks required responding to either three different pictures in a specific picture order (Cognitive: AirplaneBallCow) or three identical pictures in a specific spatial order (Motor-Spatial: UpDownRight). There were age-related improvements across all conditions and imitation, emulation and recall performance were significantly better than trial-and-error learning. Generalized linear models demonstrated that motor-spatial imitation fidelity was associated with age and motor-spatial emulation performance, but cognitive imitation fidelity was only associated with age. While this study provides evidence for multiple imitation mechanisms, the development of one of those mechanisms - motor-spatial imitation - may be bootstrapped by the development of another social learning skill - motor-spatial emulation. Together, these findings provide important clues about the development of imitation, which is arguably a distinctive feature of the human species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available