4.5 Article

Efficient surface water flow simulation on static Cartesian grid with local refinement according to key topographic features

Journal

COMPUTERS & FLUIDS
Volume 176, Issue -, Pages 117-134

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.03.024

Keywords

Shallow water equations; Non-uniform grid; Finite volume method; Godunov-type scheme; Flood

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [19672016]
  2. State Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [41330858]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Qinghai Province [2015-ZJ-936Q]
  4. UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) [NE/K008781/1]
  5. NERC [NE/K008781/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aiming at improving the computational efficiency without accuracy losses for surface water flow simulation, this paper presents a structured but non-uniform grid system incorporated into a Godunov-type finite volume scheme. The proposed grid system can detect the key topographic features in the computational domain where high-resolution mesh is in need for reliably solving the shallow water equations. The mesh refinement is automatically carried out in these areas while the mesh in the rest of the domain remains coarse. The criterion determining the refinement is suggested by a dimensionless number with a fixed value of 0.2 after sensitivity analysis. Three laboratory and field-scale test cases are employed to demonstrate the performance of the model for flow simulations on the new non-uniform grids. In all of the tests, the grid system is shown to successfully generate high-resolution mesh only in those areas with abruptly changing topographic features that dominate the flooding processes. To produce numerical solutions of similar accuracy, the non-uniform grid based model is able to accelerate by about two times comparing with the fine uniform grid based counterpart. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available