4.5 Article

Meshfree particle numerical modelling of sub-aerial and submerged landslides

Journal

COMPUTERS & FLUIDS
Volume 172, Issue -, Pages 109-121

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.06.023

Keywords

Submerged and sub-aerial landslides; Meshfree particle modeling; Multiphase granular continuum; WC-MPS method

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel multiphase mesh-free particle numerical model is developed and applied for modeling of sub aerial (dry) and submerged (underwater) landslides. The model is based on the weakly-compressible moving particle semi-implicit method (WC-MPS), and treats the multiphase system of water and granular materials as a multi-density multi-viscosity continuum. The viscous behaviour of the granular material is predicted using a visco-plastic rheological model (i.e. mu(1)) with a dynamic inter-grain mechanical pressure. The model is validated and evaluated for the rigid, sub-aerial and submerged landslides in comparison with the available experimental measurements and past numerical results. The granular surface profile and the evolution of the granular mass are compared. Comparisons show a good agreement between the results of the developed model and those of the experiments, and also a better accuracy comparing to the past numerical studies. The results also show the capability of the model in dealing with the shape evolution and the deformation and fragmentation of granular interface. Complementary experiments on the sub-aerial landslide are also conducted to study the relevant physics and validate the model. The role of the rheological model is also investigated. Comparing the mu(1) rheology with the widely-used Herschel-Bulkley model shows a slightly more accurate granular profiles for the mu(1) rheology, for both sub-aerial and submerged landslides. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available