4.7 Article

Staying motivated to e-learn: Person- and variable-centred perspectives on the longitudinal risks and support

Journal

COMPUTERS & EDUCATION
Volume 120, Issue -, Pages 227-240

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.006

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Persistence in any of the growing variety of e-learning formats is a longstanding and pernicious problem. The widely acknowledged nature of this issue makes the considerable gap in our understanding of students' motivation to e-learn a serious concern. Building on initial studies, the current research examines important predictors and outcomes of students' motivation for weekly review and extension e-learning experiences within a blended course. The present study aimed to simultaneously provide variable and person-centred longitudinal perspectives on students' motivations to e-learn, thereby illustrating the potential outcomes of these experiences and indicating how they might be better structured and supported. Japanese students (n = 642) studying in a blended course of foreign language study (two classes a week, with weekly online review and extension activities) completed surveys at three time points across an academic semester of study. Prior language competency and final e-learning completion were also included in modelling. Variable-centred results highlighted the essential role of teachers in supporting students' ability, value and effort related motivations for studying online. All three motivations played an important role in predicting e-learning completion. Person-centred results, tracking student movement between latent subgroups, confirmed the importance of teachers, but also indicated a prior competence threshold below which teacher efforts alone might be insufficient to support substantive motivation for e-learning, and thereby, e-learning completion. The theoretical and practical implications of the present study's findings regarding teacher-support and initial content competence are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available