4.7 Article

MatchingTools: A Python library for symbolic effective field theory calculations

Journal

COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 227, Issue -, Pages 42-50

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2018.02.016

Keywords

Effective; Tree; Integration; Matching; Redundancies; Python

Funding

  1. Spanish MECD [FPU14]
  2. Spanish MINECO [FPA2013-47836-C3-2-P, FPA2016-78220-C3-1-P]
  3. Junta de Andalucia [FQM101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MatchingTools is a Python library for doing symbolic calculations in effective field theory. It provides the tools to construct general models by defining their field content and their interaction Lagrangian. Once a model is given, the heavy particles can be integrated out at the tree level to obtain an effective Lagrangian in which only the light particles appear. After integration, some of the terms of the resulting Lagrangian might not be independent. MatchingTools contains functions for transforming these terms to rewrite them in terms of any chosen set of operators. Program summary Program Title: MatchingTools Program Files doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/fpwxjg349h.1 Licensing provisions: MIT Programming language: Python (compatible with versions 2 and 3) Nature of problem: The program does two kinds of calculations: computing an effective Lagrangian for the light fields of a field theory by integrating out at the tree level the heavy fields and performing algebraic manipulations with tensors in the (effective) Lagrangian. Solution method: The tree level integration of heavy fields is done by substituting them inside the Lagrangian by a covariant derivative expansion of the solution to their equations of motion. The transformation of Lagrangians is implemented as an algorithm for finding patterns of tensor products and replacing them by sums of other products. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available