4.6 Article

Front of pack labels enhance attention to nutrition information in novel and commercial brands

Journal

FOOD POLICY
Volume 56, Issue -, Pages 76-86

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.08.001

Keywords

Obesity; Nutritional labeling; Front of pack labels; Information processing; Attentive behaviors; FOP; Nutrition labels

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [R21CA155818]
  2. Hatch Act (USDA) as a Michigan Ag Bio Station

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: (1) To assess whether Front-of-Pack (FOP) nutrition labels garner attention more readily than more complete, mandated nutrition information (the Nutrition Facts Panel (NFP), required in the US), and (2) To determine whether label design characteristics, specifically, color coding and/or coding with facial icons, increase attention to the FOP label. Methods: In two experiments, we tracked the allocation of attention while participants (n = 125) viewed novel and commercial packages with varied FOP designs using a change detection methodology. Results: We found empirical evidence that FOP labels are attended more often, and earlier, than the currently mandated NFP, and that this benefit is due both to its placement on the front of the package and to the design characteristics of the FOP. Specifically, the use of color in FOPs increased attention to the label, but there was no evidence that coding information via facial icons impacted attention. Conclusions: Our work supports a growing body of evidence supporting the use of FOP labels to attract attention to nutritional information. Findings may be relevant to inform policy decisions on labeling standards. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available