4.7 Article

Spoilage evaluation, shelf-life prediction, and potential spoilage organisms of tropical brackish water shrimp (Penaeus notialis) at different storage temperatures

Journal

FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue -, Pages 8-16

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2014.11.005

Keywords

Shrimp quality; Microbiological change; TVBN; Sensory rejection; Shelf-life prediction

Funding

  1. Netherlands Universities Foundation For International Cooperation [NPT/BEN/263]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Maintaining the freshness of shrimp is a concern to shrimp stakeholders. To improve shrimp quality management, it is of importance to evaluate shrimp spoilage characteristics. Therefore, microbiological, sensory, and chemical changes of naturally contaminated tropical brackish water shrimp (Penaeus notialis) during storage at 28 degrees C, 7 degrees C and 0 degrees C were assessed. H2S-producing bacteria were the dominant group of microorganisms at 28 degrees C and 7 degrees C whereas Pseudomonas spp. were dominant at 0 degrees C. Total volatile basic nitrogen and trimethylamine correlated well (R-2 > 0.90) with the sensory scores. An empirical model to predict the shelf-life of naturally contaminated tropical shrimp as a function of storage temperature was developed. Specific groups of organisms were isolated at the sensory rejection times and assessed for spoilage potential in shrimps of which the endogenous flora was heat inactivated. Isolates capable of producing strong off-odor identified by 16S rRNA sequencing were mainly lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and Enterobacteriaceae at 28 degrees C or 7 degrees C and Pseudomonas spp. and LAB at 0 degrees C. The study contributes to the knowledge about tropical shrimp spoilage and provides a basis for the development of methods and tools to improve shrimp quality management. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available