4.7 Article

Shape memory behavior and recovery force of 4D printed textile functional composites

Journal

COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 160, Issue -, Pages 224-230

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.03.037

Keywords

4D printing; Shape memory behavior; Recovery force; Circular braided tube; Composite

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China
  3. U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC52-07NA27344]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Four-dimensional (4D) printing of multi-directionally reinforced preforms has tremendous potential for the development of next generation functional composites by using the capabilities of 3D printing technology, 3D textile preform design, and polymer shape memory behavior. This work demonstrates the shape memory behavior and recovery force of 4D printed circular braided tube preforms and their silicone elastomer matrix composites. The preforms were printed by fused deposition modeling using the shape memory polymer (SMP), polylactic acid (PLA). The effects of braiding angle, tube wall thickness, and shape recovery temperature on the shape memory behavior of 4D printed tube preforms and their silicone elastomer matrix composites have been characterized. Measurements of shape recovery forces of the preform and composite were conducted using dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). The braided microstructural parameters and shape recovery temperature have a significant effect on the preform shape memory behavior. The introduction of the silicone elastomer matrix greatly enhances the shape recovery force, shape recovery ratio, as well as radial compressive failure load of the 4D printed preform/silicone elastomer matrix composite. Building on these results, a potential application for 4D printed textile functional composites is presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available