4.7 Article

X-ray computed tomography of polymer composites

Journal

COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 156, Issue -, Pages 305-319

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.10.023

Keywords

Polymer - matrix composites; Phase contrast; Damage mechanisms; Modelling; X-ray computed microtomography

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/F007906, EP/F001452, EP/I02249X, EP/M010619/1, EP/F028431/1, EP/M022498/1]
  2. European Research Council [695638]
  3. CINEMA [1305-00032B]
  4. DSF [1305-00032B]
  5. EPSRC [EP/I02249X/1, EP/F028431/1, EP/M022498/1, EP/M010619/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of X-ray computed tomography (CT), exploiting both synchrotron and laboratory sources, has grown significantly over the last decade, driven primarily by improvements in spatial resolution, reduction in acquisition time and the increasing availability of laboratory X-ray CT systems. It is now able to provide highly accurate three-dimensional (3D) inspections of fibre architectures, manufacturing defects and in-service damage accumulation non-destructively, allowing the user to examine cross sections that would previously have required laborious and skilled mechanical sectioning with the potential for inducing damage or loss of material. Further, by repeated acquisition of 3D images, it has opened new opportunities for time-lapse studies. This feature article reviews the technical aspects relating to the X-ray CT imaging of composites such as obtaining sufficient contrast, examination of thin panels, sample size/resolution issues, quantification of damage and defects, and image-based modelling. The capability of X-ray CT to provide important information is considered across applications ranging from manufacturing processes, through tensile and compression loading to fatigue and impact damage. The complementary advantages of laboratory and synchrotron X-ray CT are examined with a view to identify new opportunities and challenges. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available