4.7 Article

Sustainable biocarbon reinforced nylon 6/polypropylene compatibilized blends: Effect of particle size and morphology on performance of the biocomposites

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.05.018

Keywords

Biocarbon; Irregular particle shape; Biocomposite; Particle-reinforcement

Funding

  1. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA), Canada/University of Guelph-Bioeconomy for Industrial Uses Research Program Theme [030176]
  2. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada [053407]
  3. Competitive Green Technologies through AgriInnovation Program [053407]
  4. Ontario Research Fund, Research Excellence Program
  5. Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science (MRIS) [052665, 052644, ORF-RE07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of biocarbon particle size and shape on the thermo-mechanical properties of Nylon6/Polypropylene compatibilized blends were investigated at 25% loading. The biocarbon particles were milled to a size from similar to 7 mu m down to similar to 800 nm, in which the aspect ratio was reduced from similar to 5 to similar to 1. Corroboration of SEM and AFM of biocomposites illustrated a high biocarbon-matrix interaction and a reduction in the size of dispersed PP droplets after biocarbon addition. Morphological disparities between nano- and micro-sized biocarbon (porosity, particle shape) were correlated to thermo-mechanical properties of the biocomposites, particularly strength and thermal expansion, and supported by DMA experiments, 'theological investigation showed alignment in the shear direction for the widely distributed particles size at low frequencies and an unexpected plateau for all the biocomposites, attributed to the particle size and shape heterogeneities. The presence of porous biocarbon in any form showed no negative influence on the thermal stability of biocomposites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available