4.7 Article

Behaviour of concrete confined by both steel spirals and fiber-reinforced polymer under axial load

Journal

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
Volume 192, Issue -, Pages 577-591

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.041

Keywords

Concrete; Confined; Compression; Steel spirals; Fibre-reinforced polymer; FRP-steel-confined; Compressive behaviour

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51778300]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20151520]
  3. 333 Project [BRA2016421]
  4. Qinglan Project of Jiangsu Province [QL2017]
  5. Project of the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The experimental results for the behaviour of concrete columns confined by both steel spirals and fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) are presented. A total of fifty-six columns were investigated experimentally under axial load. The test program involves the number of FRP layers (1 or 2 layers), the type of FRP (CFRP and BFRP), and the spacing of the steel spirals. The test results show that both FRP and steel enhance the ultimate concrete strength and strain. The strength and ultimate deformation ability of the concrete increase as the number of external FRP layers increases or the spacing of steel spirals decreases. The compressive response of concrete columns confined by both steel spirals and FRP shows a similar trend with steel spiral-confined columns after FRP rupture, as determined by the spacing of the steel spirals. The residual strength increases, and the stress degradation rate decreases as the spacing of the steel spirals decreases. A new model is presented for evaluating the axial strength of concrete confined with both FRP and steel, and the model may accurately predict the ultimate strength of FRP-steel-confined concrete with both sufficient and insufficient confinement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available