4.5 Article

Risk factors including the presence of inflammation at the resection margins for colorectal anastomotic stenosis following surgery for diverticular disease

Journal

COLORECTAL DISEASE
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages 923-930

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/codi.14240

Keywords

Diverticulitis; stenosis; anastomosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimThe aim of this study was to investigate risk factors for anastomotic stenosis in patients operated onfor diverticular disease. Histological inflammation and diverticula at the resection margins were also considered. MethodPatients' characteristics, the surgical technique and postoperative complications were collected from the medical records. Anastomotic stenoses were evaluated prospectively by rigid sigmoidoscopy during follow-up examination. Histological specimens were examined by a single pathologist who investigated inflammation and diverticula at the resection margins. Twenty patients with anastomotic colorectal stenosis from a single tertiary centre were compared with 24 consecutive patients without stenosis. They were all operated on for diverticular disease over a specified time period. ResultsHistological inflammation and diverticula were found in 25% and 30% of the resection margins respectively. Univariate analysis showed that age >71years (P=0.0002), female gender (P=0.0069) and anastomoses located below 12cm from the anal verge (P=0.020) were risk factors for stenosis. No correlation was found between anastomotic stenosis and the presence of histological inflammation or diverticula at the resection margins. By multivariate analysis, only age >71years was found to be a statistically significant risk factor for stenosis (P=0.0003, OR=60.8, 95% CI: 6.4-575.5). ConclusionAnastomotic stenosis is a frequent, long-term complication following surgery for diverticular disease. An analysis demonstrated that age is a risk factor for colorectal stenosis and that histological inflammation and the presence of diverticula near/at the resection margins have no effect on the incidence of stenosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available