4.3 Article

Synthesis and Reactivity of a Cerium(III) Scorpionate Complex Containing a Redox Non-Innocent 2,2'-Bipyridine Ligand

Journal

INORGANICS
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages 534-553

Publisher

MDPI AG
DOI: 10.3390/inorganics3040534

Keywords

lanthanide; cerium; scorpionate; tris(pyrazolyl) borate; radical; redox non-innocent

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K039547/1, EP/L018470/1, EP/L014416/1]
  2. University of Manchester
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K039547/1, EP/L014416/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/L014416/1, EP/K039547/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Ce(III) hydrotris(3,5-dimethylpyrazolyl) borate complex [Ce(Tp(Me2))(2)(kappa(2)-dmpz)] (1) (Tp(Me2) = {HB(dmpz)(3)}(-); dmpz = 3,5-dimethylpyrazolide) was isolated in fair yield from the reaction of [Ce(I)(3)(THF)(4)] with two equivalents of [K(Tp(Me2))] via the facile decomposition of Tp(Me2). [Ce(Tp(Me2))(2)(bipy)] (2) was synthesized in poor yield by the onepot reaction of [Ce(I)(3)(THF)(4)], bipy (bipy = 2,2'-bipyridine), KC8 and two equivalents of [K(Tp(Me2))] in tetrahydrofuran (THF). The reaction of 2 with N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide produced the known decomposition product [Ce(Tp(Me2))(mu-BOpMe(2))](2) (3) (BOp(Me2) = {HBO(dmpz)(2)}(2-)) in poor yield, presumably by N-O and B-N bond cleavage of a reactive intermediate. The reaction of 2 with trimethylsilylazide gave [Ce(Tp(Me2))(2)(N-3)] (4) in poor yield; the fate of bipy and the trimethylsilyl group is unknown. Complexes 1-4 were characterized by single crystal XRD, NMR and FTIR spectroscopy and elemental analysis. Complex 2 was additionally probed by UV/Vis/NIR and Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) spectroscopies, Cyclic Voltammetry (CV) and magnetometry, which together indicate a formal 4f(1) Ce(III) center coordinated by a bipy.(-) radical anion in this system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available