4.3 Article

Young adult e-cigarette users' reasons for liking and not liking e-cigarettes: A qualitative study

Journal

PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH
Volume 30, Issue 12, Pages 1450-1469

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2015.1061129

Keywords

electronic cigarette; young adults; motives; qualitative; smoking

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute
  2. US Food and Drug Administration [3P30CA071789-15S3, 2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To gain an in-depth understanding of what young adult electronic- or e-cigarette users like or dislike about e-cigarettes. We aimed to determine the reasons that may encourage young adults to use e-cigarettes or discourage them from using e-cigarettes.Design: Twelve focus group discussions were conducted with 62 current daily e-cigarette users (63% men) of mean age=25.1years (standard deviation=5.5). Data were analysed following principles of inductive content analysis.Results: Results indicated 12 categories of reasons for liking e-cigarettes (e.g. recreation, smoking cessation) and 6 categories of reasons for not liking e-cigarettes (e.g. poor product quality, poor smoking experience).Conclusions: Young adults' motives for using or not using e-cigarettes appear to be varied and their relative importance in terms of predicting e-cigarette use initiation, dependence, and cigarette/e-cigarette dual use needs to be carefully studied in population-based, empirical studies. The current findings suggest that e-cigarettes may serve social, recreational, and sensory expectancies that are unique relative to cigarettes and not dependent on nicotine. Further, successful use of e-cigarettes in smoking cessation will likely need higher standards of product quality control, better nicotine delivery efficiency and a counselling component that would teach smokers how to manage e-cigarette devices while trying to quit smoking cigarettes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available