4.6 Article

EVIDENCE FOR HIGH-FREQUENCY QPOs WITH A 3:2 FREQUENCY RATIO FROM A 5000 SOLAR MASS BLACK HOLE

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 811, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/811/1/L11

Keywords

black hole physics; methods: data analysis; X-rays: binaries; X-rays: individual (NGC 1313 X-1)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Following the discovery of 3:2 resonance quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs) in M82X-1, we have constructed power density spectra (PDS) of all 15 (sufficiently long) XMM-Newton observations of the ultraluminous X-ray source NGC 1313 X-1 (L-X approximate to 2 x 10(40) erg s(-1)). We detect a strong QPO at a frequency of 0.29 +/- 0.01 Hz in data obtained on 2012 December 16. Subsequent searching of all the remaining observations for a 3:2/2:3 frequency pair revealed a feature at 0.46 +/- 0.02 Hz on 2003 December 13 (frequency ratio of 1.59 +/- 0.09). The global significance of the 0.29 Hz feature considering all frequencies between 0.1 and 4 Hz is >3.5 sigma. The significance of the 0.46 +/- 0.02 Hz QPO is >3.5 sigma for a search at 2/3 and 3/2 of 0.29 Hz. We also detect lower-frequency QPOs (32.9 +/- 2.6 and 79.7 +/- 1.2 mHz). All the QPOs are superimposed on a continuum consisting of flat-topped, band-limited noise, breaking into a power law at a frequency of 16 +/- 3 mHz and white noise at greater than or similar to 0.1 Hz. NGC 1313 X-1's PDS is analogous to stellar-mass black holes' (StMBHs) PDS in the so-called steep power-law state, but with the respective frequencies (both QPOs and break frequencies) scaled down by a factor of similar to 1000. Using the inverse mass-to-high-frequency QPO scaling of StMBHs, we estimate NGC 1313 X-1's black hole mass to be 5000 +/- 1300 M-circle dot, consistent with an inference from the scaling of the break frequency. However, the implied Eddington ratio, L-Edd > 0.03 +/- 0.01, is significantly lower compared to that of StMBHs in the steep power-law state (L-Edd greater than or similar to 0.2).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available