4.3 Article

Revisiting chronic rejection following living donor liver transplantation in the tacrolimus era: A single center experience

Journal

CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13161

Keywords

Banff classification; chronic rejection; donors and donation; immunosuppressive regimens; liver transplantation; living donor; rejection; rescue

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and AimsChronic rejection (CR) is an uncommon but important cause of graft dysfunction, leading to graft loss and often requires retransplantation. This study evaluates the incidence and outcome of the patients with CR at a large living donor liver transplant (LDLT) center. MethodsData of patients with CR were retrospectively analyzed in 1232 adult (age >18years) LDLT on tacrolimus (mainly)-based immunosuppression. Sirolimus/everolimus (mammalian target of rapamycin [mTOR] inhibitors) was added to baseline immunosuppression as rescue therapy in patients with CR. Data are shown as median (interquartile range [IQR]). ResultsTwenty-three patients (22 males), aged 42 (IQR 45-56) years, had biopsy-proven chronic rejection at 21 (8-44) months after liver transplantation. The incidence of chronic rejection was 1.9% in this cohort. The patients with CR (n=23) had a significantly higher incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia, acute cellular rejection, and history of anastomotic biliary strictures as compared to patients without CR. Five patients were noncompliant with immunosuppression before the diagnosis of CR. Twelve patients (52%) responded to addition of mTOR inhibitors, whereas 11 did not respond and had poor outcome. ConclusionThe incidence of chronic rejection is low in LDLT. Treatment with mTOR inhibitors can reverse graft dysfunction in approximately half of the patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available