4.6 Article

Low-temperature growth of carbon nanofiber using a vapor-facet-solid process

Journal

MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 2, Issue -, Pages E55-E61

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2014.12.003

Keywords

Carbon nanofibers; CVD growth; Growth mechanism; Fe catalyst

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most carbon nanofibers (CNFs) are grown at temperatures higher than 700 degrees C with a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) process and their growths are explained using the vapor-liquid-solid (VLS) mechanism. Herein we report the realization of low temperature growth of CNFs and the interpretation of their growth with a vapor-facet-solid (VFS) mechanism. CNFs were synthesized via a thermal CVD process at the temperature as low as 350 degrees C and characterized using elemental analysis, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and Raman spectroscopy. They feature unique structures of partly ordered discontinuous and hydrogen rich polymer sheets with a diameters of 0.5-1.5 nm. Based on a trimerization reaction occurring on the Fe catalyst surface, their initial growth step is the formation of six-membered rings from the source gas (i.e. C2H2). Subsequently, these rings act as structural unit and construct various larger planar molecules. Due to catalytic difference of the crystalline faces for a given Fe catalyst particle, a concentration gradient of hydrocarbon molecule introduces simultaneously. This gradient drives the diffusion of hydrocarbon molecule from the Fe(110) to the Fe(100) face, leading to the formation of disordered hydrogen-rich polymer structures. Highly graphitic CNFs can be obtained simply by annealing those polymer structures at higher temperatures. This growth mode proposed is workable whenever transition metal catalyzed nanostructures are synthesized by a thermal CVD process at low temperatures. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available