4.3 Article

Risk-based Monitoring of Clinical Trials: An Integrative Approach

Journal

CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS
Volume 40, Issue 7, Pages 1204-1212

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.04.020

Keywords

clinical informatics; RBM; risk-based monitoring; statistical monitoring; Xcellerate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Clinical trial monitoring is an essential component of drug development aimed at safeguarding subject safety, data quality, and protocol compliance by focusing sponsor oversight on the most important aspects of study conduct. In recent years, regulatory agencies, industry consortia, and nonprofit collaborations between industry and regulators, such as TransCelerate and International Committee for Harmonization, have been advocating a new, risk-based approach to monitoring clinical trials that places increased emphasis on critical data and processes and encourages greater use of centralized monitoring. However, how best to implement risk-based monitoring (RBM) remains unclear and subject to wide variations in tools and methodologies. The nonprescriptive nature of the regulatory guidelines, coupled with limitations in software technology, challenges in operationalization, and lack of robust evidence of superior outcomes, have hindered its widespread adoption. Methods: We describe a holistic solution that combines convenient access to data, advanced analytics, and seamless integration with established technology infrastructure to enable comprehensive assessment and mitigation of risk at the study, site, and subject level. Findings: Using data from completed RBM studies carried out in the last 4 years, we demonstrate that our implementation of RBM improves the efficiency and effectiveness of the clinical oversight process as measured on various quality, timeline, and cost dimensions. (C) 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available