4.6 Article

Single and repeated dose toxicity of citric acid-based carbon dots and a derivative in mice

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 5, Issue 111, Pages 91398-91406

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ra18391j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51433003, 51373065]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (SRFDP) [20130061130010]
  3. Graduate Innovation Fund of Jilin University [2015791192]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Supramolecular Structure and Materials of Jilin University [SKLSSM 201504]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon dots (CDs) have recently emerged as a new class of fluorescent nanomaterials and are already competitive in many respects to conventional semiconductor quantum dots (QDs). Despite CDs remarkable advantages in bioimaging, biosensing and other biomedical applications, their biosafety is still unclear. In the present study, the systematic single and repeated dose toxicity and biodistribution of two citric acid-based probes (CDs and a derivative, Et-IPCA) were investigated in vivo. For the single dose toxicity studies, the lethal dose 50 (LD50) of CDs was 391.615 mg kg(-1) and 357.771 mg kg(-1) for female and male mice, respectively, while Et-IPCA reached its saturation point in solution at 25 mg kg(-1) and did not lead to the death of any mice at that concentration. For the repeated dose toxicity studies, although there were temporary changes in hematological parameters suggesting an acute inflammatory response after seven doses, the data on the body weight, organ coefficients, hematological parameters, blood biochemistry, and organ histopathology at the end of the 90 day recovery period suggested that both the CDs and Et-IPCA had low toxicity over the 90 day period. These findings will be useful for the future development of CDs-based drug delivery systems and for the development of clinical applications of these systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available