4.4 Article

Artificial intelligence in fracture detection: transfer learning from deep convolutional neural networks

Journal

CLINICAL RADIOLOGY
Volume 73, Issue 5, Pages 439-445

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.11.015

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust (RDE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AIM: To identify the extent to which transfer learning from deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs), pre-trained on non-medical images, can be used for automated fracture detection on plain radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The top layer of the Inception v3 network was re-trained using lateral wrist radiographs to produce a model for the classification of new studies as either fracture or no fracture. The model was trained on a total of 11,112 images, after an eightfold data augmentation technique, from an initial set of 1,389 radiographs (695 fracture and 694 no fracture). The training data set was split 80:10:10 into training, validation, and test groups, respectively. An additional 100 wrist radiographs, comprising 50 fracture and 50 no fracture images, were used for final testing and statistical analysis. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) for this test was 0.954. Setting the diagnostic cut-off at a threshold designed to maximise both sensitivity and specificity resulted in values of 0.9 and 0.88, respectively. CONCLUSION: The AUC scores for this test were comparable to state-of-the-art providing proof of concept for transfer learning from CNNs in fracture detection on plain radiographs. This was achieved using only a moderate sample size. This technique is largely transferable, and therefore, has many potential applications in medical imaging, which may lead to significant improvements in workflow productivity and in clinical risk reduction. (C) 2017 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available