4.2 Article

Autoethnography in action research for health education practitioners

Journal

ACTION RESEARCH
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 411-430

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1476750315573589

Keywords

Autoethnography; action research; health education; practitioner-researcher; action research quality; methodological framework

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We propose a methodological framework for conducting collaborative and analytic autoethnography (CAAE) in action research inquiry. Similar to other action research methodologies, CAAE is: (a) systematic, framed by a research question and employing explicit, transparent methods; (b) problem-based, drawn from health educators' practices; and (c) cyclical, predicated on the assumption that a plan for implementing changes is derived from the findings and will be tested in subsequent action research cycles. The autoethnographic action research framework comprises four phases: inductive stage/formative assessmentdeveloping a hypothesis (phase 1), pre-deductive stageorganizing the study (phase 2), deductive stage/summative evaluationcollecting data and testing the hypothesis (phase 3), and synthesis stageconstructing meaning (phase 4). Collaborative analytic autoethnography supports reflexivity, awareness, and agency by providing practitioners with an explicit framework for continually evaluating the complexities of self, the Other (i.e. experiencing self from another's perspective), and context.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available