Journal
ACTION RESEARCH
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 411-430Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1476750315573589
Keywords
Autoethnography; action research; health education; practitioner-researcher; action research quality; methodological framework
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
We propose a methodological framework for conducting collaborative and analytic autoethnography (CAAE) in action research inquiry. Similar to other action research methodologies, CAAE is: (a) systematic, framed by a research question and employing explicit, transparent methods; (b) problem-based, drawn from health educators' practices; and (c) cyclical, predicated on the assumption that a plan for implementing changes is derived from the findings and will be tested in subsequent action research cycles. The autoethnographic action research framework comprises four phases: inductive stage/formative assessmentdeveloping a hypothesis (phase 1), pre-deductive stageorganizing the study (phase 2), deductive stage/summative evaluationcollecting data and testing the hypothesis (phase 3), and synthesis stageconstructing meaning (phase 4). Collaborative analytic autoethnography supports reflexivity, awareness, and agency by providing practitioners with an explicit framework for continually evaluating the complexities of self, the Other (i.e. experiencing self from another's perspective), and context.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available