Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.A Clinical Comparative Study of 3-Dimensional Accuracy between Digital and Conventional Implant Impression Techniques
Mohammed Hussein M. Alsharbaty et al.
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY (2019)
Digital workflow in full-arch implant rehabilitation with segmented minimally veneered monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: 2-year clinical follow-up
Panos Papaspyridakos et al.
JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY (2018)
Digital versus conventional implant impressions for partially edentulous arches: An evaluation of accuracy
Amin Marghalani et al.
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY (2018)
Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study
Sarah Amin et al.
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH (2017)
Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants: an in vitro study
Stefan Vandeweghe et al.
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH (2017)
In Vitro Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions: The Effect of Implant Angulation
Vanessa A. Chia et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS (2017)
Accuracy of Digital vs Conventional Implant Impression Approach: A Three-Dimensional Comparative In Vitro Analysis
Kinga Basaki et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS (2017)
Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions: Effects of Different Scanners and Implant Level
Amelia A. Chew et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS (2017)
Digital Workflow for Fixed Implant Rehabilitation of an Extremely Atrophic Edentulous Mandible in Three Appointments
Panos Papaspyridakos et al.
JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY (2017)
Monolithic implant-supported lithium disilicate (LS2) crowns in a complete digital workflow: A prospective clinical trial with a 2-year follow-up
Tim Joda et al.
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH (2017)
Clinical Fitting and Adjustment Time for Implant-Supported Crowns Comparing Digital and Conventional Workflows
Tim Joda et al.
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH (2016)
Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes
Panos Papaspyridakos et al.
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH (2016)
Patient-centered outcomes comparing digital and conventional implant impression procedures: a randomized crossover trial
Tim Joda et al.
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH (2016)
Time-efficiency analysis of the treatment with monolithic implant crowns in a digital workflow: a randomized controlled trial
Tim Joda et al.
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH (2016)
Accuracy in the digital workflow: From data acquisition to the digitally milled cast
George K. Koch et al.
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY (2016)
Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Konstantinos M. Chochlidakis et al.
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY (2016)
Fracture Strength Study of Internally Connected Zirconia Abutments Reinforced with Titanium Inserts
Hyo-Jung Chun et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS (2015)
Evaluation of the Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Implant Impression Techniques in Two Simulated Clinical Conditions by Optical Scanning
Mahmoud Sabouhi et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS (2015)
Effect of Implant Divergence on the Accuracy of Definitive Casts Created from Traditional and Digital Implant-Level Impressions: An In Vitro Comparative Study
Wei-Shao Lin et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS (2015)
Time-Efficiency Analysis Comparing Digital and Conventional Workflows for Implant Crowns: A Prospective Clinical Crossover Trial
Tim Joda et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS (2015)
Digital versus analog complete-arch impressions for single-unit premolar implant crowns: Operating time and patient preference
Ulf Schepke et al.
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY (2015)
Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods
Seok-Hwan Cho et al.
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY (2015)
Implant Success Rates for Single Crowns and Fixed Partial Dentures in General Dental Practices May be Lower Than Those Achieved in Well-controlled University or Specialty Settings
Panos Papaspyridakos
JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED DENTAL PRACTICE (2015)
Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions
Sang J. Lee et al.
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH (2015)
Accuracy of Implant Impressions for Partially and Completely Edentulous Patients: A Systematic Review
Panos Papaspyridakos et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS (2014)
Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data
Sebastian B. M. Patzelt et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (2014)
Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non-splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: an optical scanning study
Panos Papaspyridakos et al.
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH (2012)