4.7 Article

A direct correlation between the antioxidant efficiencies of caffeic acid and its alkyl esters and their concentrations in the interfacial region of olive oil emulsions. The pseudophase model interpretation of the cut-off effect

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 175, Issue -, Pages 233-242

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.10.016

Keywords

Antioxidants; Emulsions; Caffeic acid alkyl esters; Pseudophase kinetic model; Partition constants; Antioxidant distributions; Cut-off effect

Funding

  1. Xunta de Galicia [10TAL314003PR]
  2. Fondo Europeo para el Desarrollo Regional (FEDER)
  3. Universidad de Vigo
  4. Universidade do Porto
  5. Conselho de Reitores das Universidades Portuguesas (Accao Integrada Luso-Espanhola) [E40/08]
  6. National Science Foundation - United States [CHE 0411990]
  7. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture - United States [2009-02403]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently published results for a series of homologous antioxidants, AOs, of increasing alkyl chain length show a maximum in AO efficiency followed by a significant decrease for the more hydrophobic AOs, typically called the cut-off' effect. Here we demonstrate that in olive oil emulsions both antioxidant efficiencies and partition constants for distributions of AOs between the oil and interfacial regions, P-O(I), show a maximum at the C-8 ester. A reaction between caffeic acid, CA, and its specially synthesised C-1-C-16 alkyl esters, and a chemical probe is used to estimate partition constants for AO distributions and interfacial rate constants, k(I), in intact emulsions based on the pseudophase kinetic model. The model provides a natural interpretation for both the maximum and the cut-off' effect. More than 70% of the CA esters are in the interfacial region even at low surfactant volume fraction, Phi(I) = 0.005. (c) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available