4.6 Article

Nerve ultrasound normal values - Readjustment of the ultrasound pattern sum score UPSS

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 129, Issue 7, Pages 1403-1409

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.03.036

Keywords

Nerve ultrasound; Reference values; Ultrasound pattern sum score; Scoring systems; Fascicle size; Normal values

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Reference values are crucial for nerve ultrasound. Here, we reevaluated normal nerve and fas-cicle cross-sectional area (CSA) values in humans and compared them to published values. Based on these data, ultrasound pattern sum score (UPSS) boundary values were revisited and readjusted. Methods: Ultrasound of different peripheral nerves was performed in 100 healthy subjects at anatomi-cally defined landmarks. Correlations with age, gender, height and weight were calculated. Results: Overall, correspondence to other published reference values was high. Gender-dependency was found for the proximal median nerve. Dependency from height occurred in the tibial nerve (TN). Weight-dependency was not found. However, the most obvious differences were found in the TN between men >60 years and women <60 years. Thus, general boundary values were defined using the mean plus the twofold standard deviation for all subjects and nerve segments except for the TN, in which different cut-offs were proposed for elder men. Accordingly, the cut-offs for the UPSS were re-adjusted, none of the individuals revealed more than 2 points at maximum. Conclusions: The influence of distinct epidemiological factors on nerve size is most prominent in the TN, for which thus several normal values are useful. Significance: Adjusted reference values improve the accuracy of the UPSS. (C) 2018 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available