4.6 Article

Proving cortical death after vascular coma: Evoked potentials, EEG and neuroimaging

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 129, Issue 6, Pages 1105-1116

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.02.133

Keywords

Subarachnoid haemorrhage; Prognosis; Coma; Critical care; EEG; Evoked potentials

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Several studies have shown that bilateral abolition of somatosensory evoked potentials after a nontraumatic coma has 100% specificity for nonawakening with ethical consequences for active care withdrawal. We propose to evaluate the prognostic value of bilateral abolished cortical components of SEPs in severe vascular coma. Methods: A total of 144 comatose patients after subarachnoid haemorrhage were evaluated by multimodal evoked potentials (EPs); 7 patients presented a bilateral abolition of somatosensory and auditory EPs. Their prognosis value was interpreted with respect to brainstem auditory EPs, EEG, and structural imaging. Results: One patient emerged from vegetative state during follow-up; 6 patients did not return to consciousness. The main neurophysiological difference was a cortical reactivity to pain preserved in the patient who returned to consciousness. This patient had focal sub-cortical lesions, which could explain the abolition of primary cortical components by a bilateral deafferentation of somatosensory and auditory pathways. Conclusions: This is the first report of a favourable outcome after a multimodal abolition of primary cortex EPs in vascular coma. For the 3 cases of vascular coma with preserved brainstem function, EEG reactivity and cortical EPs were abolished by a diffuse ischaemia close to cerebral anoxia. Significance: The complementarity of EPs, EEG, and imaging must be emphasised if therapeutic limitations are considered to avoid over-interpretation of the prognosis value of EPs. (C) 2018 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available