4.7 Article

Fluorescence quenching study of resveratrol binding to zein and gliadin: Towards a more rational approach to resveratrol encapsulation using water-insoluble proteins

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 185, Issue -, Pages 261-267

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.03.128

Keywords

Zein; Gliadin; Nanoparticles; Microparticles; Resveratrol; Encapsulation; Delivery; Fluorescence

Funding

  1. Secretaria de Ciencia Tecnologia e Innovacion del Distrito Federal (SECITI, Mexico City)
  2. 'Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek - Vlaanderen' (FWO, Brussels, Belgium)
  3. European Commission 7th Framework Program [FP7-People-2011-IOF-300408]
  4. United States Department of Agriculture, NRI [2011-03539, 2013-03795]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several health benefits have been ascribed to consumption of resveratrol, a polyphenol that can be extracted from grape skins. However, its use as a nutraceutical ingredient is compromised by its low water solubility, chemical stability, and bioavailability. Encapsulation of resveratrol in protein nanoparticles can be used to overcome these issues. Fluorescence quenching experiments were used to study the interaction of resveratrol with gliadin and zein. Resveratrol interacted with both proteins, but the binding constant was higher for zein than for gliadin at 35 degrees C. Furthermore, binding between resveratrol and gliadin increased at higher temperatures, which was not observed for zein. Analysis of the thermodynamic parameters suggested that resveratrol-gliadin binding mainly occurs through hydrophobic interactions while the binding with zein is predominantly mediated through hydrogen bonds. These results help rationalise ingredient selection and production of protein nanoparticles and microparticles for encapsulation, protection and release of resveratrol and potentially other bioactive compounds. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available