4.7 Article

Comparing antioxidant capacity of purine alkaloids: A new, efficient trio for screening and discovering potential antioxidants in vitro and in vivo

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 176, Issue -, Pages 411-419

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.12.087

Keywords

Antioxidant capacity; ORAC; CAA; Chick embryo; Purine alkaloids; Caffeine; Theacrine

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [81102485]
  2. Trans-Century Training Program Foundation for the Talents of the State Education Commission [NCET-12-0678]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [S2011040004893, S20120011316]
  4. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou [2012J22000073, 2013J4501037]
  5. Foundation for Distinguished Young Talents in Higher Education of Guangdong [LYM11023]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [21612421, 21612355]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The most commonly applied strategies for the evaluation of antioxidant capacity are the chemical- or cell-based approaches. However, the results obtained from these methods might not reflect the antioxidant ability of test samples within organisms. In this study, we propose a combination of experiments, including oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC), cellular antioxidant activity assay (CAA), and the chick embryo model, as an efficient trio to evaluate antioxidant capacity of food components. Taking purine alkaloids as example, results demonstrate that chemical and cellular method might misinterpret their true ability on antioxidation. In chick embryo model, caffeine and theacrine can significantly improve vessel density on chorioallantoic membrane and myocardial apoptosis. The mechanism can be involving multiple targets within the organism. We believe that the trio proposed can be widely utilized in screening massive number of antioxidant in a cost-effective way. It will also help discovering new antioxidants that are easily being omitted due to their relatively poor in vitro activities. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available