4.7 Article

A three-dimensional framework to explore corporate sustainability activities in the mining industry: Current status and challenges ahead

Journal

RESOURCES POLICY
Volume 46, Issue -, Pages 101-115

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2014.10.009

Keywords

Corporate sustainability; Mining industry; Multi-dimensional framework; Cross-functional exchange; Sustainability reporting; Content analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper examines current implementation status of corporate sustainability activities (CSA) in the mining industry. Specifically, it proposes and applies a multi-dimensional framework to analyze the implementation of GSA from three different angles: 1. the types of GSA from philanthropic to entrepreneurial activities, 2. the issues addressed (e.g., health, safety, environment) and 3. the step of the value chain concerned, i.e., supply, production or product-related sustainability activities. The research adopts qualitative and quantitative content analysis of sustainability reports from 16 mining companies from major mining regions and commodities. Findings from this study illustrate a broad implementation landscape of GSA with a focus on the systematic management (type) of environmental aspects (issue) at mining operations (step of the value chain). However, there are implementation challenges ahead. Although receiving growing attention, entrepreneurial sustainability activities as well as activities beyond the direct sphere of corporate influence, such as upstream supply and downstream product-related GSA, are mentioned to a lesser degree. Adopting an organizational learning and capabilities perspective, the study discusses increased exchange across corporate functions as a means to taclde these challenges and enhance corporate capabilities in dealing with these unexplored sustainability activities in the mining industry. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available