4.5 Article

Nationwide Survey of Patients With Giant Coronary Aneurysm Secondary to Kawasaki Disease 1999-2010 in Japan

Journal

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
Volume 82, Issue 1, Pages 239-+

Publisher

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0433

Keywords

Aneurysm; Coronary disease; Kawasaki disease; Remote period

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [26461624]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K09696] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Giant coronary aneurysm is the most severe sequela in Kawasaki disease, occurring in approximately 0.2% of patients in Japan. Regression is rare, while myocardial infarction (MI) and sudden death are relatively common. Herein, we reviewed patients with giant coronary aneurysm in a 10-year period. Methods and Results: A nationwide questionnaire survey was conducted based on a national epidemiological database from 1999 to 2010. We identified 355 giant coronary aneurysm patients, of whom 209 were analyzed. The 5- and 10-year total cardiac event-free rates were 0.72 and 0.68, respectively. Twelve patients died, and MI was observed in 32 patients (18.1%). Five and 6 deaths were due to coronary rupture and MI, respectively. All ruptures occurred within 1 month of onset, while most MI occurred within 18 months. There was no death beyond 2 years. Aneurysm size was significantly related to the occurrence of MI in both the right and left coronary arteries. At the time of writing, 55% of patients had no exercise limitations. And including patients who cannot perform strenuous exercises, 81% of patients were leading ordinary lives. Conclusions: Severe cardiac events are likely to occur within 2 years from onset of Kawasaki disease, while no deaths occurred beyond this time. Hence, careful monitoring is needed especially for the first 2 years. Most patients with giant coronary aneurysms can lead ordinary lives with appropriate management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available