4.5 Article

Constraints on the sum of neutrino masses using cosmological data including the latest extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey DR14 quasar sample

Journal

CHINESE PHYSICS C
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/6/065103

Keywords

neutrino mass; mass hierarchy; cosmological constraints

Funding

  1. Research Grant Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [14301214]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11505018]
  3. Chongqing Science and Technology Plan Project [Cstc2015jvyj40031]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate the constraints on the sum of neutrino masses (Sigma m(v)) using the most recent cosmological data, which combines the distance measurement from baryonic acoustic oscillation in the extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey DR14 quasar sample with the power spectra of temperature and polarization anisotropies in the cosmic microwave background from the Planck 2015 data release. We also use other low-redshift observations, including the baryonic acoustic oscillation at relatively low redshifts, Type Ia supernovae, and the local measurement of the Hubble constant. In the standard cosmological constant A cold dark matter plus massive neutrino model, we obtain the 95% upper limit to be Sigma m(v), < 0.129 eV for the degenerate mass hierarchy, Sigma m(v), < 0.159 eV for the normal mass hierarchy, and Sigma m(v), <0.189 eV for the inverted mass hierarchy. Based on Bayesian evidence, we find that the degenerate hierarchy is positively supported, and the current data combination cannot distinguish between normal and inverted hierarchies. Assuming the degenerate mass hierarchy, we extend our study to non-standard cosmological models including generic dark energy, spatial curvature, and extra relativistic degrees of freedom, but find these models are not favored by the data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available