4.5 Article

Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China

Journal

CHINESE GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCE
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 86-99

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11769-018-0933-y

Keywords

ecosystem services; spatial pattern; Principal Component Analysis; trade-offs; synergies; Taihu Lake Basin (TLB)

Funding

  1. National Social Science Foundation of China [14BJY021]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40901296, U1404402]
  3. Youth backbone teachers of Henan province's universities [2014GGJS-044]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding the spatial interactions among multiple ecosystem services is crucial for ecosystem services management. Ecosystem services, including crop production, freshwater supply, aquatic production, net primary production, soil conservation, water conservation, flood regulation, forest recreation, were measured at 1-km grid scale covering the Taihu Lake Basin (TLB) of China. Our objective is to get a comprehensive understanding of the spatial distributions, trade-offs, synergies of multiple ecosystem services across the TLB. Our results found that: 1) majority of ecosystem services were clustered in space and had a similar spatial distribution pattern with the geographical resource endowment. Most of the landscape contributed a high supply of no services, one or two, and a low supply of three to seven services. 2) There were high correlation between forest recreation and freshwater supply and regulating services. Aquatic production had low correlation with other services. 3) The changes of provisioning services led to trade-offs between regulating services and cultural services in the TLB, while synergies mainly occurred among the provisioning service. 4) The spatial relationships of multiple services are consistent at 1-km spatial scale, counties and provinces. This research could help integrate multiple ecosystem services across scales and serve as a reference for decision making.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available